It’s Time for a Hybrid Economy

America used to be a nation of practical people. The challenges of the untamed New World demanded practical solutions. The US Constitution itself, with its tripartite balancing act, was a practical approach to governing. But with prosperity and middle age, has come an American sense of self-righteous entitlement in which we have convinced ourselves we’re the arbiters of higher truths. It’s time we climb down off our pulpits and get back to our practical roots.

For the past 30 years or so, the engineering of our economy has been driven by a utopian style ideology of perfectly unfettered free markets. Alan Greenspan, in his testimony before the United Sates congress, said it clearly enough, “I made policy decisions based on an ideology I believed to be true.”

His ideologically driven social engineering, and it was social engineering, was part of a free market fundamentalism that included deconstructing market regulatory instruments, eliminating regulatory tools for managing international trade, flattening progressive taxation policies, and unweaving social safety nets. But the world never stands up to salute our utopian ideas, whatever they might be.

The the ideology of free-market fundamentalism has now served up the same disastrous results as religious fundamentalism, Marxism, and Socialism. To quote from Greenspan’s testimony once again, “My ideology proved wrong”. To which I might all reply, “Sooner or later, all ideologies are proven wrong.”

With ideology like that it’s no wonder that U.S. Automakers were unable to envision practical solutions to their headlong race to self-destruction. A most excellent example was their failure to pursue hybrid vehicles.

Hybrid cars are the antithesis of “true”, but they are practical. Instead of waiting for utopian solutions like hydrogen fuel cells and cold fusion, Japanese engineers designed cars that mixed and matched existing technologies in ways that maximized their best characteristics and minimized their worst. The result was to create a solution that makes things better in the here and now. Simply put, the hybrid car is a practical solution to the practical problems caused by the excessive burning of fossil fuels. Once the problem was acknowledged, all engineers needed to do was to combine well known technologies such as internal combustion engines, electric motors, batteries, new low weight materials, and palatable esthetics, into an optimized whole that does the job of transporting people, cheaper, quieter, cleaner, and funner. What’s more, once on the road toward optimizing the synthesis of these technologies, they are well on the way to learning more, inventing more, and continuously improving their solutions. Now it’s time for Americans to dump the self-righteous ideological stuff to get back to their practical nature. It’s time to create a hybrid economy.

To create our hybrid economy, we must dispense with ideology and consider the practical problems and challenges inherent in human economic activity. We must acknowledge that we live in a complex, dangerous, and challenging world that will not tolerate superstitious ideological solutions and slap-dash methods.

About marc

Instructional Design Consultant
This entry was posted in Current Events, Leadership, Methods. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to It’s Time for a Hybrid Economy

  1. Jed Rothwell says:

    Excellent comments.

    Note that plug-hybrids will be even better than hybrids, and they will be available from Toyota soon. You can upgrade a Prius to the plug in mode for $6,000, to get over 100 mpg. (The larger battery buffer boosts mileage even after stored electricity is depleted.) Americans are doing this, and an American patented the first hybrid car in 1906. We can still innovate and it is management’s fault that our automobile companies are in trouble.

    GE has been trying to make the perfect plug in hybrid, the Volt, instead of making a good-enough version. Another example of ideology trumping good engineering.

    Your broader point about ideology is also welcome. I believe Obama shares your views, based on his book.

    The only thing you have wrong is that cold fusion is a lot closer to being practical than you realize. I am something of an expert on that subject, since I have edited HUNDREDS of scientific papers on the subject, and uploaded ~600 out of my collection of 3,500. I wish I could upload more, but the peer-reviewed journals will not let me. See:

    http://lenr-canr.org/

    You might enjoy the book I wrote, which expresses several ideas similar to yours. It was recommended by Arthur C. Clarke and many distinguished professors. See:

    http://lenr-canr.org/BookBlurb.htm

    Enjoy!

    - Jed Rothwell, Librarian, LENR-CANR.org

  2. Marc Hersch says:

    Jed,

    Thanks for taking the time to read and comment on my Hybrid Economy entry. I must admit that I have little expertise in the field of cold fusion, so I happily defer to your expertise.

    On the topic of ideas and actions bounded by ideology—I am deeply frustrated by the nonsense that continues to be spewed by media outlets, so-called experts, and politicians. The problem of “can’t do that” ideological thinking has been with us a long time and has been contributing to a steady deterioration of our national enterprise. Recent events are bringing this decline to the forefront and it’s time we assume a wartime footing in dealing with the crisis that has been long brewing. If we shun ideological thinking and begin thinking and acting in practical “can do” terms, solutions abound.

    Thanks again,
    Marc Hersch
    Three Sigma Systems

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>