<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Production Line Theory of Education</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.3sigma.com/production-line-theory-of-education/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.3sigma.com/production-line-theory-of-education/</link>
	<description>Surfing the brink of chaos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:47:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc</title>
		<link>http://www.3sigma.com/production-line-theory-of-education/comment-page-1/#comment-1989</link>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3sigma.com/?p=1411#comment-1989</guid>
		<description>Hi Frank,

I have only a few minutes to reply at this moment so I will be very brief---too brief. But if this continues to interest you, post again. 

All narratives (stories) are communal. They are a process of telling that goes on between people. There are no truly private narratives. &quot;My story&quot; that tells who I am and how I got to be me is a story that has been constructed by myself in interaction with others. Likewise, communities, clubs, workplaces, nations, etc. are all narratives. 

Narratives are stories and like all stories they have a theoretical basis. This means that in the course of our lives as individuals and groups, we move forward as actors with some purpose or intention. Most purposes arise as we deal with problems and challenges of life. Our intentions are to act to solve problems, fill needs and fulfill desires. Whether we recognize or not, at the center of our narratives are theories about how the world works and  how we have met past challenges and might meet future challenges. 

So learning is actually a socially interactive process of addressing the world through actions based in theory and then seeing what works better and what works worse. Learning is actually a process in which knowledge is created by a community that constructs theory in order to deal with life&#039;s challenges. This process operates at many levels of experience but the principle is the same. 

So teachers do not carry knowledge. Knowledge is not a thing. It cannot be repeated and it cannot be copies. Knowledge is something that people are constantly creating as they move forward in life. When a teacher recounts something they &quot;know&quot; they are recounting a theory of the world.  The student does not &quot;receive&quot; that knowledge but responds to the teacher as one more experience in the course of living. The adept teacher who understands what is going on, will insinuate herself as a participant in the knowledge creating process. Having learned a theory of knowledge creation, she will facilitate the process of story telling for classroom of students or a single student. 

1. She will drop the idea of &quot;treating&quot; students, or anyone else for that matter. People are not diseases to be treated. 

2. Every lesson plan will always take the form of a question that pertains to an aim or purpose and then prompt a discussion of method (which is always based in theory). For example, &quot;If we can agree that this (insert aim here) is worth doing, how might we proceed?&quot; It is not necessary to do battle over aims. Many variations on a theme will do just fine. 

Children can do this at a very early age, including pre-schoolers.

3. Given an aim, she will ask &quot;By what method shall we go forward?&quot; or words to that effect. You and I know that this begins a process of hypothesis formation---&quot;If this, then that&quot;. It is not necessary for the students to &quot;know&quot; that this is what is going on. The process is quite natural and it is the process that matters. 

4. She will act as a facilitator to clarify competing hypotheses and move the debate forward. 

5. She will come up with a way to chose among the theories. The method chosen is not very important, so long as the hypothesis to be tested is among those produced in the discussion. For example, I have had students propose magical methods. We tried them. They didn&#039;t work. NEXT!

6. Work out how to run a process that tests the hypothesis and then run it and evaluate by measurement and observation.

7. Adopt the theory-based method, revise  it or abandon it. New questions and aims will flow from the process allowing everyone to move forward. 

It is not difficult to teach teachers to steer using this method and remain within the general curriculum guidelines. I have done this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Frank,</p>
<p>I have only a few minutes to reply at this moment so I will be very brief&#8212;too brief. But if this continues to interest you, post again. </p>
<p>All narratives (stories) are communal. They are a process of telling that goes on between people. There are no truly private narratives. &#8220;My story&#8221; that tells who I am and how I got to be me is a story that has been constructed by myself in interaction with others. Likewise, communities, clubs, workplaces, nations, etc. are all narratives. </p>
<p>Narratives are stories and like all stories they have a theoretical basis. This means that in the course of our lives as individuals and groups, we move forward as actors with some purpose or intention. Most purposes arise as we deal with problems and challenges of life. Our intentions are to act to solve problems, fill needs and fulfill desires. Whether we recognize or not, at the center of our narratives are theories about how the world works and  how we have met past challenges and might meet future challenges. </p>
<p>So learning is actually a socially interactive process of addressing the world through actions based in theory and then seeing what works better and what works worse. Learning is actually a process in which knowledge is created by a community that constructs theory in order to deal with life&#8217;s challenges. This process operates at many levels of experience but the principle is the same. </p>
<p>So teachers do not carry knowledge. Knowledge is not a thing. It cannot be repeated and it cannot be copies. Knowledge is something that people are constantly creating as they move forward in life. When a teacher recounts something they &#8220;know&#8221; they are recounting a theory of the world.  The student does not &#8220;receive&#8221; that knowledge but responds to the teacher as one more experience in the course of living. The adept teacher who understands what is going on, will insinuate herself as a participant in the knowledge creating process. Having learned a theory of knowledge creation, she will facilitate the process of story telling for classroom of students or a single student. </p>
<p>1. She will drop the idea of &#8220;treating&#8221; students, or anyone else for that matter. People are not diseases to be treated. </p>
<p>2. Every lesson plan will always take the form of a question that pertains to an aim or purpose and then prompt a discussion of method (which is always based in theory). For example, &#8220;If we can agree that this (insert aim here) is worth doing, how might we proceed?&#8221; It is not necessary to do battle over aims. Many variations on a theme will do just fine. </p>
<p>Children can do this at a very early age, including pre-schoolers.</p>
<p>3. Given an aim, she will ask &#8220;By what method shall we go forward?&#8221; or words to that effect. You and I know that this begins a process of hypothesis formation&#8212;&#8221;If this, then that&#8221;. It is not necessary for the students to &#8220;know&#8221; that this is what is going on. The process is quite natural and it is the process that matters. </p>
<p>4. She will act as a facilitator to clarify competing hypotheses and move the debate forward. </p>
<p>5. She will come up with a way to chose among the theories. The method chosen is not very important, so long as the hypothesis to be tested is among those produced in the discussion. For example, I have had students propose magical methods. We tried them. They didn&#8217;t work. NEXT!</p>
<p>6. Work out how to run a process that tests the hypothesis and then run it and evaluate by measurement and observation.</p>
<p>7. Adopt the theory-based method, revise  it or abandon it. New questions and aims will flow from the process allowing everyone to move forward. </p>
<p>It is not difficult to teach teachers to steer using this method and remain within the general curriculum guidelines. I have done this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.3sigma.com/production-line-theory-of-education/comment-page-1/#comment-1976</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 06:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3sigma.com/?p=1411#comment-1976</guid>
		<description>OK, this sounds interesting, but what does it mean specifically?

Key argument: &quot;Knowing is an active process propelled by the continuous interactive generation of a community narrative&quot;.

What do you mean by that? I agree that focus on results only won&#039;t improve a system. So how is treating students as participants different from treating them as objects in the educational enterprise? How would learning occur in this case?

Regards, Frank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, this sounds interesting, but what does it mean specifically?</p>
<p>Key argument: &#8220;Knowing is an active process propelled by the continuous interactive generation of a community narrative&#8221;.</p>
<p>What do you mean by that? I agree that focus on results only won&#8217;t improve a system. So how is treating students as participants different from treating them as objects in the educational enterprise? How would learning occur in this case?</p>
<p>Regards, Frank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Business 101 for the New Economic Age: The Efficiency Myth &#124; Three Sigma Systems</title>
		<link>http://www.3sigma.com/production-line-theory-of-education/comment-page-1/#comment-1965</link>
		<dc:creator>Business 101 for the New Economic Age: The Efficiency Myth &#124; Three Sigma Systems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3sigma.com/?p=1411#comment-1965</guid>
		<description>[...] in terms of our aims. If instead, we strive to bring the system into a balanced and predictable state, we can try new things and compare how the system we know is affected by what we cannot yet know. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in terms of our aims. If instead, we strive to bring the system into a balanced and predictable state, we can try new things and compare how the system we know is affected by what we cannot yet know. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

